In one of my answers a few days ago, when I accidentally mentioned the name of Song Shiming scholar Deng Guangming ( https://www.zhihu.com/question/59044212/answer/507605547 ), a person suddenly sneered at it. Mr
I didn't go to the end of this sentence. I couldn't find the reason for Deng Lao. I saw more of it, what is the drummer of Marxist historiography, what patriotism blindly touted Yue Fei, what advocated the big one can not afford us. Pang's Hangda (mistaken), but after some people in the comment area asked, I felt that the news suddenly went in a strange direction - "Shan Han folklore Deng Guangming"!
what? Is there such an operation?
Sui Hanism Deng Guangming!
Populist Deng Guangming!
Nazi thought Deng Guangming!
Help Jiang Gong Deng Guangming!
It’s so unpredictable that so much suddenly! My soul of the gossip was ignited at once - Deng Gongsan, who had a big eyebrow and a big eye, did you think that you still have this black history?
Have you heard that?
It’s not clear when the time is long?
Anything else can't be remembered, so I remember a Monson...
Mengsen? Is Mengsen, a professor at the Department of History at Peking University?
Peking University? Is that Peking University’s undergraduate course?
Deng Guangming? Is that Deng Guangming who graduated in 1936?
1936? Was it the first two years of Mengsen’s death?
Master Mengsen, the founder of the history of the Ming and Qing Dynasties,
In the last two or three years of academic life,
What is the history of the Qing Dynasty, an undergraduate student who majored in the history of Song Dynasty?
Let's talk about why I heard the stench of this rumor, I know that he can't get a little bit of evidence to support his argument.
Because Mr. Deng Guangming’s generation of scholars, born in the era of the national war of resistance and the awakening of the Chinese nation’s consciousness, and the skillful use of Marxist historical materialism to study, cannot make such mistakes at all.
The following is an excerpt from Mr. Deng Guangming's "Several Issues Concerning the Evaluation of Song, Jin War and Yue Fei". Then compare this rumor, which is particularly sour.
First, Mr. Deng defined the “foreign peoples” as foreign powers since the mid-19th century.
Second, the justice of the war between the various ethnic groups of the Chinese nation depends on whether it is an oppressor.
Third, the Jurchen anti-Liao is a just war. A Bone is not only a hero of the Jurchen, but also a hero of the entire nation of the Chinese nation.
——Do you want to be a young scholar who can’t be positive again? "People"?
In the first section of the first chapter of the "Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party," Comrade Mao Zedong once said: The
people of all ethnic groups of the Chinese nation oppose the oppression of foreign nations. Rebellion should be used to relieve this oppression. They are in favor of equal unity and are not in favor of mutual oppression. In the thousands of years of the Chinese nation, many national heroes and revolutionary leaders have emerged.
The "foreign peoples" mentioned here also include ethnic groups from outside China, such as the Dutch who occupied our Taiwan in the seventeenth century, but mainly refer to one of the "nationalities of the Chinese nation." Because, before the mid-nineteenth century, apart from the Dutch who Zheng Cheng successfully drove from Taiwan, there was no ethnic group other than the Chinese nation on the territory of China, to oppress any ethnic group of the Chinese nation. Moreover, for foreigners like the Netherlands, the people of all ethnic groups of the Chinese nation cannot talk about "equal union." The fact that often and in large numbers appear on the territory of China is only the struggle between the various ethnic groups of the Chinese nation. After each large-scale mutual struggle, it is always the integration of people of all ethnic groups.
When the ethnic groups within the Chinese nation struggle with each other, there is always one party stronger and the other party weaker. On the one hand, justice is on the other hand, and on the other hand, it is unjust. Therefore, one party must be oppressive and the other party be accepted. Oppressed . In the case of the struggle between the Jurchen aristocrats and the Khitans in the northeastern region of China in the early 12th century, the Jurchens were under the rule of the Qidan aristocracy of the Liao Dynasty, and they were oppressed by the Liao Dynasty in politics. In the economic aspect, it was also subjected to the cruel exploitation of the Liao Dynasty. Since 1114, the Jurchen people have been under the leadership of the chieftain of the Yanyan Ministry, and they have resisted the rule of the Liao Dynasty. It took eight or nine years to put the Liao Dynasty’s Shangjing Linhuang Palace and Liaoyang, Tokyo. The government, the Beijing-based Dading House, the Xijing Yunzhong House, and the Nanjing Jingjin House all captured and destroyed the Liao regime. This war, which has been going on for more than a decade, was initiated and provoked by the chief of the Jurchen family, but it was caused by the harsh crush of the Khitan rulers on the Jurchen family for a long time. In order to dispel the resistance from the Qidan nationality, the "foreign nation" oppression and exploitation, in a word, is a just war. Thus leading the war, and achieving a victory in successive wins, a fight, his struggle is in line with the interests of the entire Jurchen people, and not at the expense of the interests of the Khitan people, therefore, we take it for granted Should be called Yan A Gu as a national hero. It is not only a national hero within the narrow scope of the Jurchen, but also a national hero belonging to the entire Chinese nation.